ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The effect of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on pregnancy outcome in women with sickle cell disease (SCD) is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the severity of the SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women with SCD and its impact on pregnancy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included SCD pregnant women tested positive for COVID-19 between March 2020 - February 2021. The primary endpoint was the severity of the COVID-19 infection. Secondary endpoints were pregnancy complications and fetal outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period among 82 pregnant women with SCD, 8 have presented symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 and were tested positive. A common mild clinical presentation was observed in 6 women (75%), one woman was asymptomatic and one required oxygen. The latter was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit and a cesarean section was performed in the context of an ongoing vaso-occlusive crisis and acute chest syndrome together with incidental preeclampsia. Labor was induced in another patient who developed a vaso-occlusive crisis after COVID-19 remission. Fetal outcomes were good with an average Apgar score of 10 and normal umbilical blood pH at birth. Two newborns were small-for-gestational-age as expected on the ultrasound follow-up before occurrence of COVID-19. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 infection in our population of pregnant women with SCD had typical presentation and rarely triggered a sickle cell crisis or other complications. Fetal outcomes were good and did not seem to be directly influenced by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Further studies are required to confirm these observations as compared to the population of women with SCD without COVID-19 infection.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell , COVID-19 , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Anemia, Sickle Cell/epidemiology , Cesarean Section , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Pregnant Women , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
RESEARCH QUESTION: Does mild COVID-19 infection affect the ovarian reserve of women undergoing an assisted reproductive technology (ART) protocol? DESIGN: A prospective observational study was conducted between June and December 2020 at the ART unit of Tenon Hospital, Paris. Women managed at the unit for fertility issues by in-vitro fecundation, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI), fertility preservation, frozen embryo transfer or artificial insemination, and with an anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) test carried out within 12 months preceding ART treatment, were included. All the women underwent a COVID rapid detection test (RDT) and AMH concentrations between those who tested positive (RDT positive) and those who tested negative (RDT negative). RESULTS: The study population consisted of 118 women, 11.9% (14/118) of whom were COVID RDT positive. None of the tested women presented with a history of severe COVID-19 infection. The difference between the initial AMH concentration and AMH concentration tested during ART treatment was not significantly different between the COVID RDT positive group and COVID RDT negative group (-1.33 ng/ml [-0.35 to -1.61) versus -0.59 ng/ml [-0.15 to -1.11], Pâ¯=â¯0.22). CONCLUSION: A history of mild COVID-19 infection does not seem to alter the ovarian reserve as evaluated by AMH concentrations. Although these results are reassuring, further studies are necessary to assess the effect of COVID-19 on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing ART.
Subject(s)
Anti-Mullerian Hormone/blood , COVID-19/physiopathology , Ovarian Reserve , Adult , COVID-19/blood , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Prospective Studies , Reproductive Techniques, AssistedABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the impact of lockdown for SARS-CoV-2 on breast cancer management via an online survey in a French multicentre setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a multicentre retrospective study, over the strict lockdown period from March 16th to May 11th, 2020 in metropolitan France. 20 centres were solicited, of which 12 responded to the survey. RESULTS: 50% of the centres increased their surgical activity, 33% decreased it and 17% did not change it during containment. Some centres had to cancel (17%) or postpone (33%) patient-requested interventions due to fear of SARS-CoV-2. Four and 6 centres (33% and 50%) respectively cancelled and postponed interventions for medical reasons. In the usual period, 83% of the centres perform their conservative surgeries on an outpatient basis, otherwise the length of hospital stay was 24 to 48 h. All the centres except one performed conservative surgery on an outpatient basis during the lockdown period, for which. 8% performed mastectomies on an outpatient basis during the usual period. During lockdown, 50% of the centres reduced their hospitalization duration (25% outpatient /25% early discharge on Day 1). CONCLUSION: This study explored possibilities for management during the first pandemic lockdown. The COVID-19 pandemic required a total reorganization of the healthcare system, including the care pathways for cancer patients.